Every market figure, and where it came from.
None of these are our numbers. They are the published figures we use to argue that the problem is worth measuring, and you should treat them the way we do.
Every source below sells marketing services into this category, so each has an interest in the numbers looking a certain way. Web Tonic and Tandem also cite overlapping material, so treat them as one line of evidence rather than two independent ones. The ranges are wide because the underlying data is thin. None of them is a measurement of your agency, which is the entire reason the audit starts by measuring it.
Figures we cut, and why.
A ledger that only lists what survived is marketing. These are the numbers that were available, tempting, and left out.
Market size and growth rate
A widely repeated $14B-with-25%-CAGR figure did not survive checking. The $14B traces to CNBC rather than the outlet it is usually credited to, published CAGRs range from 10.8% to 21.46%, and the 2022 base year is variously given as $5.4B, $13.27B and $14B. Cut rather than hedged.
California's 2026 agency obligations
Expanded registration, outcome-data reporting and a hidden-fee prohibition are all hedged in the source as things that may expand or could include. Anticipated, not enacted, so not used.
Any payback or savings figure
Removed twice, deliberately. A journey completes twelve to eighteen months after a twelve-week engagement ends, gated by clinics, attorneys, intended-parent demand and biology. In-engagement metrics are published instead.